If you really wanted to kill the conservative movement, slow it down, cripple it, what would you do? Sure, you could trot out your bay area liberal, Barbara Boxer, with her union machine and her record of victories and her treacherous campaign tactics, but---really, she isn't much of a Goliath. She looks a bit more like the wicked witch of the west, with a few flying monkeys hovering behind her. At heart, I don't think the voters of California really care much for her shrill scolding. If someone is brave enough to throw a little water on her, she'll melt.We're especially amused at "treacherous campaign tactics," as the Senator has soundly trounced her last two opponents, neither of whom required "treacherous" tactics. We appreciate Patrick Henry pointing out her "record of victories," as well as which of her policies, positions & so forth are so unpopular she'll be melting. Fuck, Jim Pat, you practically pissed right on her, is she melting yet? Pretty brave of you, though. Are you as brave as Mickey Kaus? He's been tossing water in the Senator's direction, if not actually on her, & is mouthing the same "union machine" line.
Barbara Boxer isn't the problem. Our problem is our own fear--the fear that is sewn [sic] amongst us by the enemy within.
The problem of the cowardly inner enemy (Who, we'd been thinking, was home-grown terror-sympathizers & socialist Democrats just like us. What a surprise.) is, ta-da, Stalinism. Purity tests, & then the purges, to insure the inevitable dialectical victory of
You look with contempt on a "purity test," because that, after all, would make the conservative cause true, simple, and victorious.Yep. Conservatism can only be failed, & we must be certain that the new
The enemy of the socialist, the radical environmentalist, the globalist, and the corporate monopolist is mental and moral clarity.
We haven't even mentioned the spurned-lover lambasting applied to Sarah Palin, & the general apocalyptic tone ("the enemy") among other high points, because we are lazy, & Steve M. took on the other good parts admirably. (Not to imply in any way that we would have gone any further had he not, of course.)
No comments:
Post a Comment