And how else would a FOX station illustrate such a study? (++meta, huh? 'Cause you still get to peep.)Merely the beginning of the campaign, 'though.
Having agreed that Meg Whitman was a whore, we assume what little feminist credibility we had is shot, but if we may, who the hell is Laura Donovan & why is she subjecting her sisters to the male gaze?
Not to mention:
Peepers of the world, unite. |
Of course, if Ms.Donovan is a Sarah Palin feminist, or such a young & committed ideologue that "pissing off the libs" is all the justification she needs for virtually anything, not to worry, we guess.
And best of luck to Tuck & his exciting new approach to whatever it is he's trying to do. We just want to know if/when there will be nipples.
UPDATE (2155PT 4 March 2011): Not that we were necessarily presenting the heart health item as true, but it isn't:
The article referred to above was not printed in The New England Journal of Medicine or any other major medical journal. It is, in fact, a slight reworking of a piece that has run on at least two occasions in that celebrated tabloid Fountain of Truth, the Weekly World News (13 May 1997 and 21 March 2000) and has escaped into the wild.Eyes forward!
2 comments:
Hmmmm. Fake or real? I see a lot of fakeroos in those pics.
Society Page Editor Types:
Thank you for the feminist viewpoint. It's exactly what's needed here.
Post a Comment