Politics may be the reason why the media has so far failed to report the small role of genes. The political right believes that genes largely explain why the poor are poor, as well as twice as likely as the rich to be mentally ill. To them, the poor are genetic mud, sinking to the bottom of the genetic pool.We kept telling you fucking assholes your pig society was driving us mad, didn't we? Maybe this time you'll listen, before more people get hurt.
Writing in 2000, the political scientist Charles Murray made a rash prediction he may now regret. "The story of human nature, as revealed by genetics and neuroscience, will be conservative in its political [shape]." The American poor would turn out to have significantly different genes to the affluent: "This is not unimaginable. It is almost certainly true." Almost certainly false, more like.
Instead, the Human Genome Project is rapidly providing a scientific basis for the political left. Childhood maltreatment, economic inequality and excessive materialism seem the main determinants of mental illness. State-sponsored interventions, like reduced inequality, are the most likely solutions.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Science Goes Too Far
by
M. Bouffant
at
17:40
What will Andy Sullivan say about this obviously biased bit of left-wing coverage?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
The American poor would turn out to have significantly different genes to the affluent
Yeah, they have the "conscience" gene.
Eugenics Editor Agonizes:
This development does have us worried we may not be able to locate a religious belief gene we could breed (or something) away.
Post a Comment