On Beyond Pathetic

Via memeorandum, w/ emphasis on the dum(b, as a fucking post) a perfect example of "None so blind as those who will not see, but instead invent paranoid narratives."

Cheryl Teh / Insider:
A photo shared by the DOJ shows Trump kept a framed copy of an unflattering Time-magazine [sic] cover at his Mar-a-Lago home

David Edwards / Raw Story:   Trump lawyer objects to DOJ investigating ‘mundane’ crimes like ‘espionage’ at Mar-a-Lago

Kyle Becker / The Wildfire Newsletter:   The Biden DOJ Attaches Photo of ‘Top Secret’ Mar-a-Lago Docs — Then People Instantly Spot the Problem with It

Sara Boboltz / HuffPost:   Trump Freaks Out On Truth Social After More Mar-A-Lago Raid Details Are Made Public

The "problem", apparently, is that the top secret documents cover pages are right there in plain view, & you can see the classification codes on them. To be fair in assigning blame, a sizable chunk of this substack of shit was inspired by a Turley Tweet.

The Biden DOJ Attaches Photo of 'Top Secret' Mar-a-Lago Docs — Then People Instantly Spot the Problem with It

One other problem. We note that young Kyle has fully bought into the "one weird trick" school of iNternet clickbaiting, to wit: "Then People Instantly Spot the Problem with It". Cretin. Or Russian. Anyway, once in a while you just can't resist, so I left this golden nugget, preserved for eternity here, as I suspect it may not live long there.

You cultists are so deliberately dense. Do you not remember typing "white cover sheets neatly layed [sic] on top of them"? No one can see anything that risks national security. You quote Turley, "It is curious that the DOJ would release this particular picture. The point is to state a fact that hardly needs an optical confirmation: the possession of documents with classified cover sheets", yet your opening sentence calls them "alleged 'top secret' documents". You'll all be crying "fake" & "planted" no matter the evidence. And the point of the TIME cover is that the alleged documents were in the same box as the magazine covers, not that that cover of TIME is a "veiled threat". How could it be a "threat" if Trump had it framed?

I could go on, but your minds are made up & none of you want to be confused w/ facts or logic.