Pthirus Pubis Finds A Home

What's important to Phil Robertson about colored people, & tells him race relations were just fine under Jim Crow? That the darkies weren't bitching about honkies:

On growing up in pre-civil-rights-era Louisiana
“I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.”

What in hell were the happy field workers singing? "How Much Is That Doggie In the Window?"

At Breitbart's Corpse John Nolte explains it all by invoking the mystic power of Context. The context mostly being shut up & obey Gawd like we tell you then there won't be any more problems.

Obviously, context is everything when it comes to understanding truth, but context is also kryptonite to an anti-Christian media and left only interested in furthering their own bigoted agenda.

If you look at the full context of what Robertson said, including the quote about loving one another that the media is going out of its way to not report, how can the media claim that Robertson said homosexuals are going to Hell? Or that he singled out homosexuals? Or that he compared homosexuality to bestiality.

We in the Evil Leftist Media do it like this, a process known to initiates as "quotation:"

“Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,” he says.

Got that, Nolte?

If Robertson compared homosexuality to bestiality, he also compared adultery, drunkenness and greed to bestiality -- and no one is arguing that.

What? No one's arguing that Robertson indeed compared them all? Or no one's arguing the comparisons? Maybe no one's arguing it because they don't know what Nolte's arguing.

You can only claim what the left and the media are claiming about Robertson if you are lying, and it is just a fact that through the act of omission (the quote above) and commission, the media are lying.

Phil Robertson is anti-sin, believes we should all love one another, and believes we can all be saved through the grace of Jesus Christ.

Only the media and the left could be offended by that.

Or the two thirds of the world who don't thump Bibles. Or by people who don't think hateful religious boilerplate is made perfectly O.K. by the immediate self-contradiction of the we-should-all-love-one-another religious platitude.

Bonus Science & Logic from the guy single-handedly insuring the survival of crab lice (Pthirus pubis) on the planet:

On why he voted Romney in 2012
“If I'm lost at three o'clock in a major metropolitan area...I ask myself: Where would I rather be trying to walk with my wife and children? One of the guys who's running for president is out of Chicago, Illinois, and the other one is from Salt Lake City, Utah. [Editor's note: Romney is from Boston, not Salt Lake City.] Where would I rather be turned around at three o'clock in the morning? I opted for Salt Lake City. I think it would be safer.”

In a decent society Mr. Robertson would carve his little duck-calls in a sheltered workshop in exchange for room & board. Have they no shame?