That The New York Times believes this to be a big deal, or even meaningful, says what needs to be said about said organization.
BREAKING NEWS | Monday, December 16, 2013 3:32 PM EST |
|
Newser please. Live in the real world for thirty seconds; nothing short of life imprisonment for all involved & complete destruction of all the hardware might stop it for a while; a piece of paper from an activist judge not worth the match it takes to light it stops nothing. How many divisions does that judge have?
And now that we've read it (The alert, not the entire item. Are you fucking kidding?) the phrase "most likely violates the Constitution" leaps at us. That's a hell of a finding. Is that legal? Or even a decision?
1 comment:
Apparently it is so significant that blooger is not updating your posts in the floating blog roll...I still have
Just Another Blog (From L. A.)™
A Message
1 day ago
in mine.
~
Post a Comment