And Jim being so dense, he forgot the word "repeal" in his headline, so some might think this was written during the Clinton Administration.
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Law Advances in US Senate
Our favorite establishes the REAL/not so real dichotomy in the service.The problem with repealing DADT won’t be the troops. Not the REAL troops, mind you. The problem will be those who now join because it’s “cool” and because they can now play gay soldiers. The problem will be the media, the politicians and the lawyers.A call for a junta:
Remember this is NOT A REPEAL. Framing it as a “repeal” is part of the propaganda pushing the agenda. This bill voids Clinton’s executive order which installed DADT then changes the existing BAN on gays serving in the military.Straight-up drooling Sharia Law paranoia:
So the enlightened representatives of the American people overrule 3 of the 4 Joint Chiefs of Staff.
They-the Gay Lobby have worked so hard to destroy the one thing that protects them, the U.S. Constitution. And the Same sex marriage approval will have all of them filing for marriage, in effect a registration of their life-style. Same for Gays serving in military. All their identities will be known. Then when (and if) sharia comes into the law of the USA, already being used for mortgages, the lists will be examined and the firing squad readied. and the Gays did it to themselves.Yeah, right:
A future Soldier in Big Gay Obama’s Big Gay ArmyShower fears ("Maaaah-mmm! Make Justin stop looking at meeee!"):
http://www.folsomstreetfair.com/photos/folsom-2010/index.php?slide=5
Disgusting!What does it all mean?/No idea how the military works:
The number of recruits will dwindle based on this garbage. Wars are always around to be fought so that means welcome back our old buddy called The Draft! Our proud military didn’t sign up for this! They voiced their opinion in overwhelming numbers saying this won’t work but it’s forced down their throats anyway.
I hope all you “tolerant” people are happy, you know the ones who don’t currently serve and don’t have the same sex watching you shower and getting their jollies from the peep show each and every day and night, sometimes with the option of forced physical contact. If the showers were coed and the men could watch the women and vice versa I’m sure more straight men would sign up for that deal but no, the straight men and women get hung out like meat puppets for openly gay people to gawk over openly! How long before straight men/women bring lawsuits over sexual harassment? That should be a stop to this horrible repeal very soon! DISGUSTING!
I still don’t know what “openly gay” means. Is is lisping and talking like a catty girl? Is it wearing sequined halter tops (or otherwise channeling Liberace)? Or is it more like “pestering straight guys for sex until they apply their fist to the offender’s nose”, at which point the gay guy can go to his CO and whine that “He picked on me just because I’m gay”?Obligatory Barney Frank reference:
Because I’m evil-minded and suspicious, I’m betting that this last possibility is what is REALLY being discussed here: a way to put one over on the straight guys, and give the homosexuals undeserved power in the military hierarchy (more or less, “If you don’t back down on this, that, or the other, I’ll file a harassment charge against you, and you’ll wind up with so many demerits you’ll be a private for life”).
DADT simply requires gays in service to act professionally. I don’t understand why they would have such a problem with that so it must be a money benefit issue for their lovers. However, there is a chance our Navy submarines and ships could turn into Barney Frank’s fairy boat to Fire Island . Immagine if these were the people who landed at Normandy !….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2pIjzxp8Tg(They sure know where all the gay stuff on the Internet is, don't they?)
<Gomer Pyle>"Surpise, surprise, that ain't my finger!"</Gomer Pyle>:
After Basic Training Graduation Ceremonies are completed, does that mean that a gay boy can kiss his boyfriend in front of everyone? The gay way of sticking their finger in our eye, no doubt.Telebision ruined forever by "it" being shoved in a face:
I fear for the guys and gals that are not gay. I am afraid that now the gays will use their new found rights to cause trouble for the straight ones. Guess who will be forced out of the military?We'd type something to the effect of "If they want to be stupid fucking morons that is their problem but stop shoving it in my face," but, knowing where the commas go, we just couldn't. And of course we'd be accused of being hateful & trying to quash free speech.
What was so dog gone important to shout their gayness? We get enough shoved in our faces in our every day life. Can’t even watch HGTV any more with out having gay couples buying homes, etc! ALL THE TIME! Sorry I have about turned off HGTV for good.
If they want to be gay that is their problem but stop shoving it in my face.
3 comments:
"Shoved in our faces?"
I can't believe he missed the opportunity to write about things being shoved down his throat.
Do a search: The First Scandal Adam and Eve.
Kindly Editor Who Helps Even The Incompetent Weirdo Commenters Is Grateful That:
Mr. Hagedorn did not explain his little theory here. One could look here, where he explains it (BUTT-SECKS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN!!) or at his web log, where it's still incomprehensible.
Editor Who Appreciates Competent Commenters:
Real good typing there: Didn't go w/ the entire obvious cliché.
Post a Comment