Is this any more to be believed than any of Thomas L. Friedman's imaginary taxi-drivers? Yes & no.
Probably, except that "defense expert" should be accurately described as a flack from a "defense" lobbyist, or a retired military officer now employed by a defense contractor, taking orders from a lobbyist/flack/corporate drone.
Possibly, in that it may have been Goldfarb's own idea (It could happen!) but realizing that an item attributed to an anonymous emailer will have more credibility than anything for which he takes credit, the "e-mail" may just have been a reply from a lobbyist doing Michael's work for him/providing him the military-industrial party line.
So the real question is origin. Whatever.
The gist of the mysterious e-mail is that these United Snakes won't have enough destructive power to reduce more than five or six countries at a time to smoking rubble in the near future. Knowing that, how can we live w/ ourselves?
See also: Cheney, Liz, who thinks the gutting of our military is making Americans uncomfortable & causing "birtherism."
"People are fundamentally uncomfortable, and they're fundamentally increasingly uncomfortable with an American president who seems to be afraid to defend America," she said "The kind of thing you saw on this video is indicative of sort of a general feeling of discomfort."We don't quite follow this. Is B. O. going to surrender us to his fellow Kenyans? If BHO, Sr., was a British subject, is this a Lyndon LaRouche deal, wherein Heroin Dealer-in-Chief Queen Elizabeth II & her wholly-owned subsidiary UniLever/Royal Dutch Shell finally teach the colonials a richly-deserved lesson?
Or is it just that no election that they haven't stolen or had handed to them by the Supreme Court can ever be legitimate in their democracy hating eyes?
No comments:
Post a Comment