Saturday, March 29, 2008

Stop Loss, Part Deux: Army of Rubes

You're probably aware that words like "honor," "duty," & "integrity" have been dragged through the mud & stripped of all meaning by the American military, much as their civilian counterparts in the forces of fascist repression have removed all meaning from, among others, words like "liberty" & "freedom." A particular example would be as described in an L. A. Times marketing review of the new Paramount flick Stop-Loss (Yes, we typed "marketing review." We don't know what else to call it. Look for yourself.):
the stop-loss military provision that can legally re-conscript combat veterans -- even against their wills -- creating what has been decried as a "back-door draft."
(We think there's something else of a "back-door" nature there. Ouch!) Unlike real wars, WWII for example, where enlistments or conscription were "for the duration," the "professionals" of the American armed services currently enlist for a fixed term. Just one little problem: If it is decided that a soldier or Marine is somehow better at ground pounding, baby bayoneting, or interrogating insurgents, he or she can be kept in the service by means of the "stop-loss" provision in the enlistment contract. How much honor do you think was involved in the recruiter's explanation of the enlistment papers? Even subtler, though perhaps not quite as dishonorable, is the old "you'll be able to get a really good job when you get out, 'cause the Army/Navy/Air Force/Marines will train you for something," schtick they pull on the yout'. Don't believe a word of that either. From the L. A. Times of the day after the above Stop-Loss marketing story. Bear in mind that this is the VFW talking, not the Hippie-Dippie Peacenik Association:
Daniel M. Ortiz, department service director of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S., says the military misleads young recruits into believing that a stint in the armed forces turns them into attractive job candidates. "I don't put it past our military to spin stories that soldiers will get the best training and, when they get out, they'll have the world at their feet," said Ortiz, a veteran of the first Gulf War. "It is a false promise." The transitional assistance program run by the Department of Defense is insufficient, Ortiz said. And when veterans get intimidated by the lack of job opportunities, many give up on finding civilian work and reenlist, he said. Discouraged by an unsuccessful job search, with no gas money to go to interviews or college, Fabian Serrano, 27, of Riverside County, said he was tempted to rejoin the Marines. He doubts he will ever find his ideal job as a cartoon designer, or any other worthwhile post. And with a wife, parents and younger brother to support, Serrano said he can't take a minimum-wage position and hope for a promotion later. A fellow Marine persuaded the sergeant, who served in Iraq and is now in the Reserve, to attend his first job fair. But Serrano had no resume -- only a high school diploma and nearly a decade of experience shooting cannons and working as a military policeman. "I have no good sense of direction of where to start and where to go. None of my experience transfers," he said. "There's nothing out here for me, so I might as well go back to active duty and stay there."
So assuming you weren't stop-lossed from getting out in the first place, you're screwed if you can get out, & may end up re-upping, Never forget that words like "duty," "honor," "patriotism," "integrity," & so on are w/o meaning. They are used merely to cause knee-jerk reactions in the naive & trusting (or just plain stupid) so they'll follow orders & die for this country, even though this country won't educate them or provide jobs that would give them something worth defending. Noble warriors, our ass! Suckers, every last one. An Army of Rubes, as it were.

4 comments:

Nixon said...

If it is decided that a soldier or Marine is somehow better at ground pounding, baby bayoneting,

Baby-bayoneting? I'm sure you're aware that Marines no longer use bayonets in combat, but I'm glad it contributed to your jingoistic rant.

M. Bouffant said...

The Editor Replies:

Thanks for the link. Can't wait for your fellow baby-killers to visit.

We don't believe that "jingoistic" means what you think it means. Try an on-line, or even a real dead-tree dictionary.

Indeed, we are as opposite from jingoism as can be.

Please advise what you all use to kill innocent civilians for Exxon-Mobil profits now. Or do you just leave it to the AF & Marine Aviation?

Nixon said...

M. Bouffant,

Believe it or not, we avoid killing civilians and actually try to provide security for the population. But if you believe that Exxon Mobil has secret oil wells in Mesopotamia, and that everything that Americans serving in Iraq say is propaganda, well, I guess you don't have to believe anything I say.

M. Bouffant said...

The Editor Re-replies:

OK, we'll believe you when you say there are no Exxon-Mobil wells in Mesopotamia (Isn't that what al-Qaeda likes to call the colonial construct of "Iraq?") but there are plenty of non-secret wells that are being exploited by Western corporations via no-bid contracts.

And we actually do believe that the vast majority of our people in Iraq aren't out to kill civilians, & hope to provide security for the population. (We like to start controversy too.) But should American forces be fighting what are really Iraqi battles?

It goes back to Woodrow Wilson & Lyndon Johnson, both of whom made statements along the lines of "We're not sending our boys to fight their battles," but both turned out to be liars.

We certainly believe that everything that Americans "serving" in Washington, D. C. say is propaganda. Talk about "mission creep!!"