![]() |
| Homo erectus skulls. From the hard drive. |
This apparently did not apply to most of your ancestors.
James Cole / Nature:
Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic — Abstract — Episodes of Palaeolithic cannibalism have frequently been defined as ‘nutritional’ in nature, but with little empirical evidence to assess their dietary significance.Discussion:
The Conversation / Raw Story: Our ancestors were cannibals - and probably not because they needed the caloriesSputnik International: Stone Age Cannibals Got No Nutritional Value From Eating Humans, Study ClaimsBryson Masse / Motherboard: Our Ancestors Engaged in Cannibalism For Fun and Profit, Not Just For CaloriesNicholas St. Fleur / New York Times: Ancient Cannibals Didn't Eat Just for the Calories, Study SuggestsAlessandra Potenza / The Verge: How many calories is that human? A nutritional guide for prehistoric cannibalsGeorge Dvorsky / Gizmodo: Ancient Humans Didn't Turn to Cannibalism For the Calories

No comments:
Post a Comment
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)