Sweet Blood of Jesus I am sick sick sick & tired of hearing or reading about the hateful basketball-addled residents of Hoosier-land. Screw alla you rat bastards!
SB 101 will help protect religious freedom in Indiana by providing protection for individuals with sincerely held religious beliefs, along with Christian businesses and churches.
SB 101 will help protect individuals, Christian businesses and churches from those supporting homosexual marriages and those supporting government recognition and approval of gender identity (male cross-dressers).
Here are just 3 examples:
Christian bakers, florists and photographers should not be punished for refusing to participate in a homosexual marriage!
A Christian business should not be punished for refusing to allow a man to use the women’s restroom!
A church should not be punished because they refuse to let the church be used for a homosexual wedding!
Son of a fucking bitch this sheep-populated nation needs a Freedom From Religion Act!
I was with you until example #3. I don't think churches should be forced to sanction anyone's marriage. Currently, you can't even be considered to use a church unless you are a member in a lot of churches -- even if you're a hetero-, cisgendered, couple. Otherwise though, public accommodations should accommodate the public. And merchants offering service to the public shouldn't get to define who the "public" is.
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)
I was with you until example #3. I don't think churches should be forced to sanction anyone's marriage. Currently, you can't even be considered to use a church unless you are a member in a lot of churches -- even if you're a hetero-, cisgendered, couple. Otherwise though, public accommodations should accommodate the public. And merchants offering service to the public shouldn't get to define who the "public" is.
ReplyDelete