Saturday, September 8, 2012

Dep't. of Self-Aggrandizement

Highly rated!
We're very, very proud of ourself that while we called Mataconis an "ignoramus" in our first draft, we deleted it & appeared civil.

9 comments:

  1. But Doug is an ignoramus!

    Why does M.B. insist on hiding the truth???
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  2. Truthiness Editor:
    For the greater good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doug will put the ignor into ignoramus, you betcha!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Indeed. You are far more circumspect than I. I've just been arguing with an obvious right wing troll over at Think Progress - probably because I've had a few glasses of wine.

    Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well I got a shout-out from TBogg which is, like, almost as good.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Never leave "ignoramus" out of your platform, MB

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ego Editor:
    "Wisdom of crowds" or wisdom of TBogg? Equal, we'd say.

    We were completely straight-edge at the time; probably wouldn't've bothered otherwise. (Or edited ourself, either.)

    But we'll be more ignoramus-inclusive next time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Top Ranking Editor:
    Might've done even better if we had called him a name or two.

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)