One question: Shouldn't they have started the trench a bit earlier?
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Rock News & Views
Regular readers/viewers may have noticed our linking to coverage of LACMA's Rock. Neither for nor against, we are only amused. Someone thinks about it & types. (We couldn't be bothered.)
One question: Shouldn't they have started the trench a bit earlier?
Related, barely: Non-LACMA light standard display.
One question: Shouldn't they have started the trench a bit earlier?
3 comments:
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)
WTF? THey couldn't decide what style of light to put up, so put up *every* style of light? Indecisive lighting consultant? Not as random as the mating schmoos in the riverfront park, but still.
ReplyDeleteLocal Color Editor:
ReplyDeleteIt's the Bureau of St. Lighting's "museum room."
Another repository of street lights is in a nondescript strip mall a few blocks from the Bureau of Street Lighting, on Santa Monica Boulevard and Vermont Avenue. There the curious will find an exhibit of 25 historical lamps arranged by artist Sheila Klein.
Apparently the "arrangement" was putting the tallest ones in the middle.
Ah. I liked my theory better. It's sorta like my theory of deciding on ice cream flavors at the ice cream shop. Can't decide? Why, that means I must get *all* of them!
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Gluttonous Penguin