 |
| How young we were ... South of 40, anyway. |
|
| How young we were ... South of 40, anyway. |
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)
I used to be south of 50, err 40, etc. meself.
ReplyDeleteCurrent plan: outlive slobs and horrible skin-sacks like Karl Rover, Roger (FAUX Nooze) Ailes, etc.
~
Morbid Editor:
ReplyDeleteDo not deceive yourself. Their
successors will be even worse wastes of oxygen & skin.
That large-lens look is coming back in fashion for eyeglasses, you know.
ReplyDeleteStill, sorry your friend is now-late. I went back and read my comment and now I am still wondering whether any of my former associates have passed on. Sadly, there are certainly enough friends in that category to count.
Existential Editor:
ReplyDeleteThis was posted by a friend as two other ladies we knew who were also friends of our late ex & ours recently passed on, to euphemise, though I'd never been "associated" w/ either of them. (One of the two no longer w/ us being Andrea True, who may have tortured your ears in the '70s.)
The cycling of fashion from small/narrow to big/wide never ends. As a dedicated wearer of aviator-style shades for the last X yrs. we're not sure we welcome big shades making us fashionable again.