▼

Friday, April 15, 2011

Comedy Relief

Hack Matt Lewis, who typed at AOL but was fired or something following AOL's paying Huffington to take over their shitty sites & eliminate them (Nice work if you can get it, huh Adrianna?) landed on his feet at TheDC (Along w/ such luminaries as Mickey Kaus.) where today he comments on a column written by Reagan's secret sweetheart, Peggy Noonan. (Full load [if you dare] at Noonan's rosy site.)
I found the rest of the column a bit hard to follow, but it is worth noting that somebody prominent is saying Obama is likely to lose.
Compare & contrast: "Somebody prominent" & "rest of the column a bit hard to follow." We don't know if this says more about Matt's reading comprehension or Ms. Noonan's typing skills, but it raises the question, do reactionary pundits gain prominence by being difficult to follow?

Altered later (1819PDT, 15 April 2011). Can you spot the differences?
    at

4 comments:

  1. Whale Chowder15 April, 2011 16:57

    They sure don't gain prominence based on clarity of thinking or argument.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©15 April, 2011 17:01

    TRICK QUESTION YOU COMMMMIEE!!!!

    ~

    ReplyDelete
  3. bjkeefe16 April, 2011 14:15

    Jesus. Reading Matt Lewis? Who is talking about Nooners, to boot? You've got a stronger stomach than I do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. M. Bouffant16 April, 2011 15:32

    Edit Drone Notes:

    We are simply a drone application regurgitating whatever appears in the reader.

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)