Monday, February 15, 2010

Pet Names

We think this uncannily demonstrates what a sorry, unimaginative, conformist lot Americans are.* (Especially the "Boomers," who were imposing names on children/pets in the period mentioned.)

Weird Fact

This little oddity has come up a few times recently when we've had to create email addresses for new staffers. But I just did a tally. And even though TPM is still a pretty small organization and has only had paid staffers for a few years, we've managed to have two employees named Kate, Laura, Ben, Eric, Justin, Andrew and Rachel. With 14 double-name staffers, that's got to be more than half the people who've ever worked for TPM. Presumably these were very popular names in the 1980s and very late 1970s. But it still strikes me as uncanny.

Whatever you say. We've actually known two entirely separate "Larry Goldbergs" in our abusive, mocking life.

And it doesn't even get into Jared, Jason, Jedidiah, Jonas, Jonah, Jerkwater & Jagoff. Or the three million spelling variations on "K/C" names for female 'Murkins.

(Remembered that it was typed by "Josh" Marshall about half-way through the "J" list.) Figures.

*As opposed to ourself, who have never had an original idea in our life, & have done nothing but mock people for their ugly, strange &/or revolting appearances & clothing & twist their hateful, hypocritical, stupid &/or ignorant words into mean-spirited parodies.

1 comment:

  1. Dear Just another Blog,

    I just have a quick question for you but couldn't find an email so had to resort to this. I am a progressive blogger and the owner of the mahablog. Please email me back at barbaraobrien@maacenter.org when you get a chance. Thanks.

    Barbara

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)