▼

Monday, February 1, 2010

Annals Of Photo Interpretation

Something or another from The Times of New York, in which five people are asked: "Is this a typical third-party movement? Are mainstream parties ever able to co-opt third-party messages and members?"

We needn't even read the responses. we need only examine the photograph from The Times.
Let's see: People under 30? Yes, two of them (lower left) under duress. Possibly one or two others in the crowd.

Non-Anglo participants? Hard to be sure, could be some Hispanic or Asian people in the crowd. Certainly isn't anyone of a more recent African heritage visible to these tired old eyes.

This is not the movement of the future, although it is quite a movement.
    at

2 comments:

  1. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©01 February, 2010 19:34

    Coulda swored I posted somethin' somewhere.

    Must be getting senile. At least, soon I won't remember how crappy things are.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  2. M. Bouffant01 February, 2010 19:55

    Traffic Editor Believes:

    Three items up. It's getting hard to keep track, between the volume of poop we're currently extruding & the fact that everyone's wandering the web pretty much on auto (Or senile, if you prefer.) & what, really, is the difference between the "publish your comment" box & the "X in the little red box" that will make the larger, irritating box go away?

    Y'know?

    Nor will you remember or care how crappy your pants are. (We sure don't.)

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)