New Package, Same Cretinous Shit

Here's a big chunk of crap from the lame-assed fool (Catholic) whom The New York Times has hired to replace William Kristol as the voice of conservatism on the op-ed page.

Note this interesting turn-of-phrase: 

post-Clinton return of wage stagnation

"Post-Clinton?" How about "Under-Bush?" 

Why would The NYT hire one liar to replace another? Because there are nothing but lying sacks of shit left on the right, it seems.

Douche-hat does note that, somehow, the country has shifted to the left  in the last ten yrs. (And why the fuck would that be?) 

[T]he political landscape has shifted dramatically since the days when Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich were struggling over the American center, and that in the absence of a conservatism that's responsive to the changing situation, yesterday's radicalism can start to look a lot like today's common sense.

"A conservatism that's responsive to the changing situation." We'll be holding our breath until conservatism even realizes that there is a situation, let alone that it may be changing, & we're no longer in the early 18th century. By the way, just who is responsible for that "changing situation?" Couldn't have been George W. Idiot, could it?