Scott Horton types at the 19th century American magazine that isn't
The Atlantic. But he's no
Megan McArdle or
Matthew Yglesias, so it's OK. Here's the most inflammatory part of his
25 September item, referring to General Ricardo Sanchez, U. S. Army (ret'd.):
For three months now, Sanchez has been making off-the-record statements. He eventually came to the conclusion, he says, that Republican politics had trumped the national security interests of the United States in the execution of plans in Iraq. The Bush Administration had not planned to win in Iraq, but simply to keep a war running so Bush could run around and play “war president.” That is as devastating a criticism as any general has made of a president since the days of Douglas MacArthur. Unlike MacArthur’s criticisms, however, it has the advantage of being accurate.
"Mission Accomplished!"
Scott Horton types at the 19th century American magazine that isn't The Atlantic. But he's no Megan McArdle or Matthew Yglesias, so it's OK. Here's the most inflammatory part of his 25 September item, referring to General Ricardo Sanchez, U. S. Army (ret'd.):
No comments:
Post a Comment
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)