▼

Sunday, October 26, 2025

Homoerotic Subtext From 1984

Or Is This 1954?

Either way, does nothing to convince me that most right-wing men aren't closet cases*. (Maybe most robots, too.)
Digby does note the grotesque white nationalism, not to mention the paternalistic sexism.
From the United States Department of Labor.
An ideal world w/ handsome young honkies working "manly" outdoor jobs, "Dick & Jane" exurban families, & plenty Xian churches. Not an office worker (or city) to be seen. And a man don't need no high school ejimacation to do man work. Keep 'em dumb & work 'em hard, right boss?
*NB: We reg'lar heterosexual fellers don't concern ourselves much w/ what LBGTQ people are doing. Excessive interest can be a tell, moralistic hypocrites.
    at

2 comments:

  1. muttpupdad27 October, 2025 10:09

    Why do I get the feeling that all the represented are nazis?

    ReplyDelete
  2. M. Bouffant27 October, 2025 11:20

    Spot-a-Nazi Editor:
    Because not one of them even has black hair?

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)