No Obligations Editor: Well, you don't have to, but it should kill 90 mins. while you're at work (if not working).
Don't think we've seen it all the way through since the early '70s, & don't remember that much thereof, but we were compelled enough to re-watch the the first 20 or so mins. upon discovering it on the Tube.
Sadly, didn't seem that dated. To us. No guarantees for those of a later generation. (Can't you people ever be on time? A whole generation of ten o'clock scholars. Geeze.)
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)
Rats, I was hoping for Saturday manatees.
ReplyDeleteI've never seen "Putney Swope", but Danny Peary wrote about it in his "Guide for the Film Fanatic". I guess I'll have to check it out now.
No Obligations Editor:
ReplyDeleteWell, you don't have to, but it should kill 90 mins. while you're at work (if not working).
Don't think we've seen it all the way through since the early '70s, & don't remember that much thereof, but we were compelled enough to re-watch the the first 20 or so mins. upon discovering it on the Tube.
Sadly, didn't seem that dated. To us. No guarantees for those of a later generation. (Can't you people ever be on time? A whole generation of ten o'clock scholars. Geeze.)