▼

Sunday, May 6, 2012

The Picture Of Jan Crouch

Were it not for follow-upsstuff w/ which we can link to prior items, we might not post any items at all. Today's pathetic attempt at relevancy is via bjkeefe (Real name?) & sends us to The NYT's version of the Guardian item we linked, & a NYT slide show.

And, another chance to scare the young'uns out of five yrs. growth & the old'uns a few yrs. closer to the grave:
BOO!
Sweet Blood of Jesus.
    at

2 comments:

  1. Substance McGravitas07 May, 2012 19:37

    She's a combination of Seuss and Bakker.

    ReplyDelete
  2. M. Bouffant09 May, 2012 14:41

    Faith Editor:
    Can't remember who <strike>came</strike>was first, the Bakker or the Crouch.

    ReplyDelete

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."

The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)