 |
| The lonely Weber stood & waited, but the age-old question arose: Why bother? |
 |
| Meaning we didn't have to cook or share any of this. |
|
| The lonely Weber stood & waited, but the age-old question arose: Why bother? |
|
| Meaning we didn't have to cook or share any of this. |
You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to have an attorney present while you are commenting. If you cannot afford an attorney, you are "Shit Outta Luck" (SOL). Anything you type here can & may be used against you in a court of law or in a personal "beat-down" administered by a staff member or "associate" of this "web log."
The publisher thanks Google/Bugger for denecessitating verification. (Not that we need explain anything to anyone.)
I'm sorry, but if God / Goddess / The Great Penguin had intended us to eat fish raw, then He / She would not have invented fire. That's my stance, and I'm stickin' with it ;).
ReplyDeleteEnviro & Eatin' Ed.:
ReplyDeleteJust kiddin'. No raw fish (not that we don't like sushi) that's been in the fridge for a while.
P.S.: Are the penguin cooking fires what's melting the Antarctic?
There is of course no wood for cooking fires in Antarctica. If one must eat raw fish, you do what you must do. I still cannot fathom why those who have a choice would prefer to eat chewy raw fish to the alternative, however...
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Fire-admirin' Penguin
Self-Heating Editor:
ReplyDeleteThey could try burning their own dung down south there.
If the tuna or salmon is cut small enough it's not chewy. (Swallow it whole. Don't your people have gizzards? Or maybe not. Could interfere w/ buoyancy.)