Saturday, July 2, 2016

How It Ends: Pay Or He Won't Play?

"Oh, the Humanity": Airship of Fools.
A not unreasonable assessment. (Violating copyright law in case you can't get beyond the paywall.)
Before they gather in Cleveland for their convention, it’s not too soon for Republicans to begin thinking about what exactly a Donald Trump defeat might be like.

As with his now-documented habit of charitable promises that seldom materialize, Mr. Trump never intended to endanger a sizable part of his personal wealth to fund a presidential campaign. That means he’ll continue to campaign on the cheap, by saying incendiary things and having them transmitted by the free media. Expect more speeches like the protectionist-cum-conspiracy theory speeches in suburban Pittsburgh on Tuesday and New Hampshire on Thursday, even if such diatribes frighten major donors and mainstream Republicans and make life harder for down-ticket Republican candidates in the fall.

In his mind, Mr. Trump may still envision a populist prairie fire carrying him to the White House. This is not his best plan to win, he may also admit to himself, but the one he’s willing to pay for.

Here resides the problem all along for those hoping for a Trump-to-the-middle move. Such moves are expensive. Base-broadening campaigns require lots of paid TV to reach non-engaged voters and Trump skeptics, pummeling them with reassuring images suggesting that a Trump presidency would be OK.

Mr. Trump not only is unwilling or unable to finance such a campaign. He evidently is unwilling to do what’s necessary to entice GOP donors to finance it on his behalf. This means GOP officeholders seeking re-election can expect a constant headwind of inflammatory Trump statements designed to stimulate the free media coverage that his asset-lite campaign requires. Republican candidates up and down the ballot therefore become unwilling sharers of a high-risk Trump electoral wager, a gamble more likely to end in a Hillary landslide than a Trump White House.

The more intriguing question concerns what happens if Mr. Trump decides he can’t win and no longer is willing to throw good money after bad. Unless they were born on a turnip truck yesterday, campaign vendors will be the first to figure it out. Look for them quickly to cut off services rather than get stiffed in the inevitable Trump campaign bankruptcy filing.

Mr. Trump’s harsher Republican critics are kidding themselves to think Mr. Trump is crazy or unstable and will suffer a breakdown. More likely, he will simply and coldbloodedly toss the ball to the GOP, saying, in effect, “If you want to pay for some events or TV, I’m available. Otherwise I’m done.” The GOP would then have to shoulder the dual burden of propping up a minimally respectable Trump campaign while also distancing its down-ballot candidates from Mr. Trump so they might survive.

And that’s the optimistic scenario. Mr. Trump has learned the value of audacity. He might well decide to cover his retreat and preserve his amour propre with a flurry of lawsuits and conspiracy theories about a “rigged” election.

He’s already begun putting narrative flesh on these bones. He speaks of “crooked Hillary” and increasingly of the Clinton Global Initiative, Bill Clinton’s philanthropy, and what he calls the Clintons’ “politics of personal profit and theft.” In his trade speeches, he portrays the Clintons as members of a nefarious global elite that has enriched itself while foisting impoverishing trade deals on the U.S. middle class.

He perhaps will throw in a few suggestions that foreign governments hold hidden leverage over Hillary because of her hacked, illegal email server. He’ll mention Bill Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich.

Republicans can also expect to be a target of his accusations. He doesn’t need to be plausible, just tell a story that justifies his own stance that he didn’t lose, the other side cheated, “Washington elites” conspired against him, etc.

If the Trump endgame is destined to go this way, Republicans should hope it does so early, ideally before the convention is even over. To date, Mr. Trump continues to tease top GOPers and conservatives with the idea that he may yet come their way, turn his formidable talents to advancing conservative causes. This merciless exploiting of Republican romantics has begun to seem like something out of “The Blue Angel” or Lucy with the football.

Republicans need a strategy, and lots of money to fund it, to preserve their House and Senate majorities. Do they know it? The thing they should fear most: An autumn dynamic in which Mr. Trump believes the best outcome for him personally is one that does as much damage as possible to the long-run GOP cause.
Yes, & some no. The "nagonna campaign unless you pay me" possibility is quite the potential twist. Leave it to The WSJ to imagine something more cynical than even this eternal cynic could.

Cannot, however, see it happening before or during his coronationthe convention. Not w/ two+ wks. of "veepstakes" teasing yet to enjoy.*

Also unsure: Der Donald facing any possibility he'll lose before the autumnal equinox. Or Hallowe'en. Whatever narrative bones have been fleshed recently, it's been obvious for some time that if the renowned whiner about fairness lost, he'd begin to howl "cheated, stolen, rigged, crooked, conspiracy, elites, Washington, Mexican voter fraud, blah" the moment FOXNews finally gave up & called the election for Mme. Sec'y. Clinton.
*For the contrarian hell of it, the editorial we will go out on a limb & guess that, barring bizarre V.-P. selections, convention unrest, a shooting on Fifth Ave. (maybe) or catastrophes/disasters, there'll be little appreciable change in this entire unholy mess until (Wait for it ... wait for ... two more months! Hah!) the traditional Labor Day beginning of U.S. Presidential campaigns.

21st century or not, no political savant (or Trump strategist) will know what to do until post-convention polling bumps have returned to whatever, the punters are paying attention (not before summer's gone) & polling can be trusted.

This has gone on for over a yr., & there are still four more months. If this is the price of democracy it isn't worth it.


RaflW said...

Has there ever been a negative post-convention bump? I think it might be possible this July in Cleveland.

M. Bouffant said...

Interesting Times Editor:
Trump makes history again?