Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Balancing Act

Something not nearly as bad as below, 'though also from The NYT. While he can never be forgiven for bloggingheads.tv, typist Robert Wright is not actively stupid or evil. Well, not as stupid & evil as that fool Friedman.
As a bonus, it turns out there’s a hopeful message not just in Shahzad’s testimony, but in Pipes’s incomprehension of it. Pipes exhibits a cognitive distortion that may be afflicting Americans broadly — not just on the right, but on the center and left as well. And seeing the distortion is the first step toward escaping it.

Here is how Shahzad explained his role in the holy war: “It’s a war,” he said. “I am part of that. I am part of the answer of the U.S. terrorizing the Muslim nations and the Muslim people, and on behalf of that, I’m revenging the attacks.”

Now, for a Muslim holy warrior to see his attacks as revenge runs counter to Pipes’s longstanding claim that Islamic holy war is about attack, not counterattack. Roughly since 9/11, Pipes has been telling us that jihad is “unabashedly offensive in nature, with the eventual goal of achieving Muslim dominion over the entire globe.” This notion of “jihad in the sense of territorial expansion has always been a central aspect of Muslim life” and is now “the world’s foremost source of terrorism.” That’s why you have to respond with “superior military force.”
And we get to see once again the stupidity & evil that is Daniel Pipes.

2 comments:

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

Pipes exhibits a cognitive distortion that may be afflicting Americans broadly — not just on the right, but on the center and left as well.

And the left as well?

Is this creeping Joe Kleinism?
~

M. Bouffant said...

From Chairman Editor:

Do not think, Comrade Thunder, that any true revolutionary is exempt from the dialectical process of self-criticism.

We did mention that Wright was only less than Friedman in the stupid & evil department.