Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Being Suppressed

One Mickey Kaus, who types for money at Slate had this to say about The New York Times, while discussing whether the newsiness of FOX.
6) Willingness to Suppress: You can have a commitment to accuracy, even a commitment to going out and finding and publicizing the truth for its own sake--but what happens when that commitment collides cataclysmically with your other, ideological purpose? The New York Times has a high commitment to accuracy, for example--and it's so big it almost has to be relatively tolerant of individual deviation. But would it endanger the Democrats' Senate majority by printing a series of damaging exposes of a leading Democratic Senator shortly before an election?  The Times answered that one for us in 2002.
A-hem. See also.

No comments: