Neil DiamondMr. Diamond (trying to look like Mr. Mojo Risin') shows the results you can expect from his fine new product.
to michaeldel, mbouffant,
1:23 am (13 hours ago)
Only Clinically Tested Penis N-largement Pills that works..- add 1-4 inches to
your peniis- 20% thicker- 5x more enjoyable orgasm- or your monneyy back without
question ask!Join miilliions of delighted users which has been benefitedwith
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Members of the Baking Fig Leaf Wearers Association prepare to make with the secret handshake you'll need to get into heaven:
Victoria's Secret my ass, look at this hot shit:
Yes, Novak is a colossal Catholic jerk off, but does it need capitalization?
joe3 wrote: 21 pages of hate mail. Why does WaPo still run this Jerk Off's column? 6/11/2007 8:30:33 PM
Monday, June 11, 2007
Pointless aside: This appears to be the 100th item on Just Another Blog. Blogger tells me so. I'd have to take off my shoes five times to count that high.
Sunday, June 10, 2007
"Dangerous" Dave writes:
Thursday, June, 07, 2007 11:34 PM
This, along with the recent camera phone video of that 17 year old Kurdish girl being kicked and stoned to death for dating a Sunni Boy, have made me think there is no hope for these folks. They need to be done like Ripley wanted to do to the aliens in the second Alien movie... pull out, nuke them from orbit. Maybe start the Middle East over from scratch. These are barbaric animals, and the only way to deal with them is to terrorize them. Or kill them.
Dark_Wizard writes:Have a nice day.
Friday, June, 08, 2007 4:12 AM
Don't be such a Jimmy Carter
This is what I would do if I were President Bush. Call Ahmadinejad on his cell phone (Vlad Putin has the number) and say "look to the south of Tehran at morning prayers tomorrow. The red glow on the horizon will be an oil refinery burning. If the hostages are not drinking beer in Germany on Saturday morning, then another oil refinery and one transfer terminal will be next. Oh! Just so you know, we have more cruise missiles then you have oil production facilities.
Hey, "Wiz": Try closing your quotes, and then go back to your Bungholes &
Bev writes:We'll assume "Bev" wanted to ask: "Does the word caliphate mean
Friday, June, 08, 2007 5:01 AM
agenda for Iran
Does the word Caliphate mean anything? Iran's leader has made clear his intentions. Don't look for any logic within. Anything and everything will be done within Iran's power to make this happen -- don't be fooled into thinking anything less.
anything to you?," because I know the word means something.
Oddly enough, it's not what Ahmadinejad wants, he's into the
"return of the twelfth imam," or something, which I guess is like when God, jr. comes back for the Jesusites. Nothing but foaming maniacs who can't wait to destroy the world, no matter which side of the crusade they're
It's POTUS, not "POTUSA." These people all have reading problems, & comprehension problems, & memory problems. Shorter version: They're stupid. The dangerous kind. There's Forrest Gump stupid, where people at least realize they're stupid and deal w/ it, and there's these people stupid, where some other problem keeps them from realizing they'd all be a hell of a lot better off if they'd just shut up & leave the grown-ups alone.
And from "Big Arch": If I were POTUSA I would not send cruise missiles in where NUKES would do a far better job of ending the terror of the nutcases that wear towels on their heads and hate in their hearts.
Friday, June, 08, 2007 7:57 AM
Fred, it is good to see you have a fine grasp of the situation. Now as to the solution, I like Charlie's idea better than Big Arch's nuclear answer for the simple reason that a nuke attack would cause serious ramifications whereas the tactical cruise
missile would cause minor ramifications. If we nuke, we would have to go all out and turn the entire country, if not ME, into glass. Not the worst outcome, but as I said, there would be ramifications even from our "allies".
"Not the worst outcome..." Oh. That would be...?
These people only understand might and force, anything less is considered a weakness to be exploited.
"Little curtain climber?" Huh? And a big crush on the "beloved" Navy. Or those brave, vibrant, virile sailors anyway, all pent up from months at sea...
Chopper John writes:
Friday, June, 08, 2007 9:10 AM
Dear Pres Bush It is readily apparent to some of us out here that your current crop of advisors have failed you miserably. That is, unless the problem actually lies with you failing to follow their advice. Whichever the case may be, I strongly suggest you pay serious attention to the advice offered by posters Dark Wizard and CharlieS. You must not continue to let that little curtain climber get away with flaunting his terrorist horse manure, and the advice of the aforementioned posters seems reasonably thought out and easily accomplished by our beloved Navy.
Well done, DW and CS.
Well, the old reversal works pretty well on this one. "The only way our leaders can remain in power is to constantly remind us that Muslims are our enemies and when they are destroyed, their oil will be ours." And: "...it mostly rationalization for wholesale murder." That's them. For us, however: "...the only way to solve our problem is to kill them off..." That's not wholesale murder, is it? (And I'm sure "Gunny" wants us all to think he is/was a Gunnery Sg't. in the USMC, but I'm guessing his name is from his primary occupation, picking up trash w/ one of those sticks w/ a spike on the end, & putting said trash into a gunny sack. Ha ha.)
Friday, June, 08, 2007 11:21 AM
Dangerous Dave rocks
I agree 100 percent with Dave. There is no way to placate or appease these barbarians. Their whole way of life is one of deception, riddles, lies and fakery. Their religion tells them it's OK to lie to and deceive their enemies. Their religious
leaders have complete control of their minds.The only way their leaders can remain in power is to constantly remind them that Israel and America are their enemies and that when they are destroyed, the world will open up all it's riches to them....
America and Israel are holding them hostages and are the reason they are so poor and miserable...not because of anything their own leaders are responsible for.You can listen to these Islo-Fascist people give their so-called reasons for this Jihad to rid the world of democracy, but it mostly rationalization for wholesale murder. In the end the only way to solve our
problem is to kill them off or at the very least frighten them into thinking that any more nonsense on their part will be their certain death, theirs and their families.
In which case said "hostages" will have been reduced to their component atoms & quarks as well, but, you know, gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet. Note also that Bush is now "A Liberal President."
Friday, June, 08, 2007 12:54 PM
Once Again, we have to clean up a mess that A Liberal President was too COWARDLY to take care of! It's time to drop the gloves, call that little runt, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and say, 'Put the Hostages on a plane to Germany Immediately or You Will be A Smoking Hole in The Sand!’
Friday, June, 08, 2007 12:54 PM
By the way, to paraphrase a past President with a problem in North Africa: "the American Hostages or Ahmadinejad!? And if we back it up, our message would be loud and clear.
tnmccoy's message isn't too clear. It's actually incomprehensible.
Friday, June, 08, 2007 3:52 PM
Appropriate response to Iran
Fred, get elected and treat Iran as the scoundrels they are. Conduct unrestricted warfare: carpet bomb Iran until its government is utterly destroyed and unable to resist. And then take their oil as reparations.
Right, that "carpet bombing " would only destroy the Iranian gov't. And if I'm not mistaken, those who cause damages would be the ones paying the "reparations," not those who were carpet bombed.
Friday, June, 08, 2007 4:31 PM
His strategy is brilliant. While the professional politico-piggies are slopping each other with mud, he stays above the fray. Let them spend their money and political capital while Fred hones his campaign machine in preparation for the big contest: defeating whoever the democrats nominate.
Absolutely brilliant. One little quibble, though: Fat Boy has to get nominated himself before he can defeat the Democratic nominee.
forrest sez: Fred looks vibrant and virile, and I'm sure you would agree that he could take all the other repub and dem male candidates in one on one hand to hand combat. I would go so far as to say he could take Paul and Huckabee at the same time.
Yep, it's all about grade school macho w/ the Republicans. And Viagra, I guess. "Vibrant & virile." Ooooh. You really can't tell by the noms de web these clowns use, but there may be quite a few homophobic closet cases here.
Friday, June, 08, 2007 5:29 PM
War Czar & Troop Surge
Vietnam disabused me of the nation-building notion. I don't care about trying to build a nation that will some time in the future turn on us. A better idea, IMHO, is to wage unrestricted warfare against Iraq, Afghanistan and anyone else who presents a threat into utter submission. Carpet bomb them (forward) into the Stone Age. Destroy their government and their infrastructure and then confiscate their oil as reparations. In combat, my job was to bring my men home alive and in one piece, nothing more, nothing less. And, if necessary, I prefer 10,000 Iraqi men, women and children dead in their hovels than to see even one American soldier, sailor, airman or marine so much as scratched. So I nominate me for War Czar. It's a job that would soon be unnecessary to fill. No war, no czar.
Our friend SNAFU expands his thoughts on humanity (& oil). Nation building in 'Nam? They'll all turn on us eventually, let's just kill them all right now. "In combat, my job was to bring my men home alive and in one piece, nothing more, nothing less." You weren't supposed to accomplish any missions or achieve any objectives? Or win the effin' war, single-handedly? If your only job was to bring the boys home, were you the Captain of Cut & Run? The Sergeant of Surrender? The Lieutenant of Leaving?
Friday, June, 08, 2007 6:01 PM
Thanks but I couldn't get elected, I don't have a single skeleton in my closet and if you don't mind the stench of decomposing bodies, your more then welcome to look.
Nobody beats the (Dark) Wiz. I think this may be an attempt at what passes for humor among the nuke 'em crowd. Does he think you do need a skeleton in your closet to be elected?
And we'll close this poorly laid out mess with that last one from Dark Gizzard. If he didn't have a wife would he be a homo? Or what? Apparently Freddie the Pig (and absolutely no offense intended to the fictional Freddie the Pig) dumped Wife Mark I about the time he "went Hollywood," & remained single & catting around until he latched on to Wife Mark II a few years ago. So for 17 yrs. he wasn't married. Are you worried now? (And come to think of it, maybe Wife Mark II latched on to him. Might be one of those Reagan deals: Ronnie didn't really want to be president, but Nancy ["Mommie"] wanted to be queen, so...)
Friday, June, 08, 2007 9:21 PM
"Trophy Wife" I'm glad Fred has a wife cause I would be worried if he didn't have a wife.
Pardon the crappy layout on this one. I've yet to master the blockquote function, mainly because it doesn't work in any sensible, intuitive way. WordPress or Typepad, here I come!!!!
UPDATE (25 November 2007 @ 1759 PDT): Having picked up a smidgen of HTML in the ensuing months, your editor has managed to get all the indentations correct.
Saturday, June 9, 2007
Fred "Teletubby" Thompson Pimps for Con Man, and Other Mean Things About The Bloated Toad & His Stripper-Lookin' Wife
From The New York Observer:
His “elder statesman” screen persona
obscures the fact he
is the most inexperienced of the major G.O.P.
contenders, with seven dimly
remembered years as U.S. Senator, no area of
expertise, no executive experience and no major legislative achievements bearing his
Kidnapping and hostage-taking have been the hallmark of this regime since it came into power.
Friday, June 8, 2007
Thursday, June 7, 2007
give me an excuse to show this shot of that hideous Hilton bitch even as she has been excused from her already lessened sentence. Poor tootsie, she was all depressed & heading for a nervous breakdown, so they thought they'd let her out so she could finish her sentence at her big WeHo house. Frankly, any one who would let her picture be taken like this by someone who would then allow it to get on the intrawebs deserves a more severe punishment, but we haven't yet outlawed privilege, arrogance, & stupidity. Write your various local, state & federal representatives for action on those bills. And (locals only!) show up in front of the courthouse tomorrow morning w/ signs demanding her continued incarceration! The hearing on whether or not she goes back in starts @ 0900. I don't actually know which courthouse it is, and you can fucking bet that I, in my own arrogance & privilege, will be sleeping like death itself @ 0900 tomorrow. But don't let that stop you.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
That's all well & good, and should make for some amusing confirmation hearings. But I'm the kind of person who always reads the letters section of any periodical or journal I encounter, & with all this innerweb crap, well, every moron in this great nation of ours, and many morons in other portions of this great globe of ours, many of whom actually think they have an opinion, can just type away to their hearts' delight, and short of threats of physical violence there is not only no censorship, but literally everyone who types in is published. So let the fun begin:I was a teenager in the 60's and people said some pretty strange things but no one said things as absurd as this person. This man has no right to be surgeon general of anything. Posted by:paulettec0 Jun-6 Hey, I think I was one of those people. From the standpoint of nature, it certainly isn't natural, Homosexuality if the norm would have ended humanity as a species long ago. Political Correctness has no place in society as it serves only to control how people think and censors truth. Posted by:lorinkundert Jun-6 As oppposed to, say, religion? (Or, from the standpoint of redundancy, it certainly is redundant.) WOW for once someone in Bush's team that I can relate with. Couldnt have said it better myself. Posted by:cdigi187 Jun-6 This one I don't quite follow. Is it the new "Throw Bush under the bus'' talking point, i. e., "Well, after seven years of this, I've noticed (just in time for the election, heh) that Bush isn't really a conservative, he's just another Big Spender and he was only pandering to people of faith, blah, blah, blah, so this time vote for a real conservative who'll really put the pervs in their place."? Or someone who really thinks our president is generally bad news but is overly concerned w/ human pipefitting? (And in the picky dep't.: people generally say "on" rather than "in" a team, and relate "to" rather than "with" others, don't they?) 2008 is a comin' like a frieght train! Be sure you know which track to be standing on. Posted by:kisshammer Jun-6 "kisshammer." I'm scared. Is that like Hammerskins meet KIß™*? And I'm not sure which track to be standing on, either. Maybe I should be on the platform, rather than the track, then it won't matter which track that '08 freight train is on. *Sorry, Microsnoft or whoever the hell is responsible for the fonts or whatever here, fascists though they may be, don't have the ol' SS runes (for absolute KIß™ authenticity) available...yet. (You can get Polish accentery though.) (P. S.: That's the way Microsnoft is spelled. Deal w/ it.) Homosexualtiy is an abomination in God's eyes. It is both unhealthy and unnatural. Think about it...God created two sexes, not one. I don't think anyone should be calling this man an idiot or a religious zealot...he is both educated and intelligent, besides being 100% correct. Posted by:valentinosmom Jun-6 Always wondered about people who identify themselves only by their relationship to others. No respect for the "gay" community? Why should anyone have respect for homosexuals? Posted by:valentinosmom Jun-6 Now I'm really wondering. valatinosmom: I've read some of the other comments that you've made on other threads, and it appears that you think you think that the literal bible and the laws governing our country are interchangable. They are not. For the rest of us who are not bible thumping christian fundamentalists, please keep the scripture quotes to a minimum. Just like you wouldn't want a fundamental Muslim influencing the laws of our government, we don't want a fundamental christian influencing the health policies of our government either. You have a right to your opinion-but that's all it should be. Leave religion out of legislation!!!!! Posted by:je po Jun-6 Assuming "valatinosmom" is "valentinosmom", I can stop wondering. WE ARE A BACKWORDS COUNTRY READY TO THUMP ANYONE THAT DISAGREES WITH THE BIBLE!!!! DONT JUDGE, IM NOT ABOMINATION!!!!! AND IM GAY!!!!! ANYONE QUICK TO JUDGE IS NOT FOLLOWING “GODS” RULES YOU BELIEVE IN SO IN FACT IF HELL IS REAL YOU ARE CONDEMING YOUR SELF TO IT....GET OVER YOURSELF...AND IF GAY WASNT NATURAL WHY WOULD THEIR BE GAY ANIMALS IN NATRUE!!! WOLFS, LIONS, DOGS, CATS, ECT GO THUMP YOUR BIBLE ELSEWHERE!!! Posted by:djayed07 Jun-6 I'm just sayin... (Heh. Read it as "BACKWOODS." Which works too.) Uh oh. She's back. I am not a Bible thumper. I am not trying to put religion in legislation. I am entitled to my opinions...if you don't like them, so be it...I don't really care. Posted by:valentinosmom Jun-6 And, I am not judging anyone...I am simply stating what is in the Bible...the word of God and HIs laws. I am not a hypocrite by any means. I certainly don't state my opinion regarding homosexuality and then turn around and practice such filth. You want to put your eternal soul in jeopardy...go ahead! Personally, I prefer NOT to spend eternity in a lake of fire! Just remember this little discussion when you stand before Him for judgement, because He will remind you that valentinosmom tried to tell you and you wouldn't listen. Posted by:valentinosmom Jun-6 First words out of His mouth: "Dude, valentinosmom tried to tell you..." valentinosmom- You stated "Homosexuality is an abomination in God's eyes" who are you to judge that....are you god????? how do you know what he thinks is a abomination...and the chapter in the bible that says being gay is wrong also states you should kill men if they lay with other men....and kill anyone that cheats, and "stone" a step son that sleeps with his step mother!!! Come on now!!!! how backwards is that! Im sorry but MY personal opinion is that was written by someone that is scared of anything different then themselves not god and guess what no one can prove that so I guess I will find out when I die and im not afraid one bit!!!! Posted by:djayed07 Jun-6 Not one bit! Ever seen a two headed racoon? A bus full of kids did in 1998. Nope, not natural but nature is imperfect and anyone not heteralsexual should not be discriminated as any less the a natural produce of an imperfect world. Posted by:webwaxer Jun-6 No man on two-headed raccoon sex either, Godammit!!! Ever seen a two headed racoon? A bus load of kids did in 1998. Nature isn't perfect, never was and never will be. We must respect diversity. Posted by:webwaxer Jun-6 I guess that's better. I think he meant that you cant have babies being ####,lesbian etc... gay is not a word meant for people of that nature its meaning is happy..Therefore if everyone was ####,lesbian there would be no more babies other than unnatural ways to conceive them.Seriously when are people going to quit staying on the side lines and not say something about this it has gotten to the point where everyone is afraid to say anything in fear of loosing their jobs etc..Well I for one don't care I live in America and last time I checked I have freedom to say what I want.If you think in your mind that the world should accept things like this then you to are in danger of loosing the most endangered species The Human Race. Posted by:WereAllHuman Jun-6 No comment needed. (Scared I might "loose" my job. Oh, wait, I don't have one! Ha ha. Joke's on you.) It appears that because a scientific medical opinion is in conflict with the Democratic politcal agenda and certain fringe groups, it is deemed incorrect, unscientific, and Christian blabber. Common sense teels me that Dr. Holsinger was right and concerned for the health and well-being of people who engage in certain sexual practices, gay or straight. Homosexuality is no more 'normal' or 'natural' than alcoholism. You have the choice. Posted by:Jeri38 Jun-6 And don't you forget it. Opinion: Dr. Wolsinger should be applauded for NOT being afraid to express FACTS in light of the ignorant audience of our morally declining culture. Posted by:Dr. Fact Jun-6 What? (Oh, I know more or less what the good Dr. means, but try to be clear about it, even if your thought processes are a little murky.) As an MD myself, all I can say is that any physician who would spend his valuable time writing such a research paper does not have the common sense to be the Surgeon General. Whether gay or straight, the issue is that there are far more important issues out there in public health than "rationalizing" whether same sex is natural or not... come on... 40 million people with no insurance and another 40 million with under insurance, disparity in healthcare by race and income, smoking, obesity, globalization and the spread of disease, ect... I'm afraid that if this guy becomes SG, valuable time, $ and effort will be wasted on issues that don't deserve such focus. Posted by:silverkoi941 Jun-6 Well, whatever you say, Dr. Hoity-Toity, M. D. THE ULTIMATE POINT THAT DR. WOLSINGER WAS MAKING IS THAT THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN IS NOT DESIGNED FOR THE MALE/FEMALE SANITARY SYSTEM. THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN IS DESIGNED FOR THE FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN. THIS IS NOT A DEBATE ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY AS MUCH AS IT IS ABOUT SODOMY.I AGREE THAT WE IN AMERICA ARE WASTEFUL, BUT I IMPLORE THAT NONE OF YOU PUT THINGS IN THE SANITARY SYSTEM THAT DON'T BELONG THERE. Posted by:Dr. Fact Jun-6 I'm on my knees begging and I'm screaming at you: no tampons in the toilets! To WereAllHuman, could you explain YOUR statement; my literate brain cannot understand it..."somehow I take it your offended by being your sexuality well if that be the case you already know in your heart its wrong." Oh and maybe you should check YOUR grammar. If YOU'RE going to insult me, at least do it grammatically. Posted by:legos2dot0 Jun-6 Yeah, it's least you could do, you cretinous sub-literate who might be able to type sense if you'd ever read anything besides your 17th C. book of fairy stories. Our post-modern sensibilities insist we make no judgements, even when lack of any judgement clearly points destruction. Separation of church and state? Fine. Why do we have to have a separation of common sense and state, too?Oh, and by the way, homosexuality, at least the modern 24/7/365 American version, can be "cured". I suggest you check our Exodus International for plenty of evidence. Posted by:curmudgeony Jun-6 Pomo homo. Ha ha. The modern 24/7/365 American version of homosexuality can be "cured." Well, maybe not actually cured, but, you know, "cured." The modern 24/7/365 American version, that is. Not the post-modern version, though. See brochure for further information. Sounds to me like "curing" the modern 24/7/365 American version really means shoving you all the way to the back of the closet, just as far as you can go, behind the Judy Garland LPs, maybe. And what are the other versions of the "sin that dare not speak its name?" And are they OK? The Catholic priest version, maybe? The noble, hyper-manly Spartans? Nothin' wrong with slappin' your pal on the ass after a good play, huh? No, the important thing is don't be a sissy, 'cause if the Moooooslims think we're all girly-men, they'll be swimming across all the oceans with their knives in their mouths, knowing that even after the exhausting swim, those infidel nancy-boy Americans will be easy meat. So butch up, dammit!! I am a leader in the anti-war movement, I believe Bush and Cheney are war criminals, and they should be tried, convicted and suffer the same fate of others convicted of mass murder. I have founded four homeless shelters, been a social worker for 30 years and am deeply concened about Americas central role in Global waming and the fiasco of our War on Terror. In other words, most would consider me quite liberal in my beliefs. I am also deeply concerned that each person, regardless of their beliefs, be treated with dignity and respect. Individuals who are gay deserve respect and should never be personally judged, for whom amongst us can claim the purity to judge another when there is sin in all of us? This all said, it is different to judge the act of homosexuality itself. Tho I am often appaled at Bush's appointments and ultimately may well find some other reason why this man should not be Surgeon General, the man's science is obviously sound and the real political issue is on the part of those who argue against nature on behalf of those they seek to protect from the truth. Respect them, care for them but stop lying to them and trying to decieve yoiurselves into the idea that homosexuality is a normal alternative. Homosexuality is a sexual preference born of hurt and a myriad of different reasons but it is not natural and it is not a legitimate human rights issue as the civil rights and women's movements were. Sorry my liberal friends but sometimes the truth really hurts, so I gues you yell loud and call science politics. The real problem is that it's not politically correct as the self-deluded pro=gay movement demands. Posted by:jonsvit Jun-6 I wish you fucking Catholics would just fuck off. Human idiocy aside, practically he's right. Homosexuality is inconvenient, against nature, and detracts from propigation of our species which is after all the ultimate goal if there is no God. Posted by:geekybryan Jun-6 Very inconvenient. I can't tell you how many times I've been inconvenienced by the whole thing. I thought "species propigation [sic]" was the ultimate goal because of God. Human idiocy aside, am I missing something here? The good doctor can't spell...second paragraph of his "paper" contains the word "concensus," correct spelling would be "consensus." I'm surprised this misspelling remains after 16 years. Perhaps, the "paper" has never been read! :) Posted by:dcspencer2003 Jun-6 There's always a smarty-pants in the crowd who has to go and read what everyone else is just talking about. The good doctor can't spell and I believe, perhaps, no one has read his "paper" over the past 16 years. 2nd paragraph, 1st page: the word "concensus" is used. I believe the correct spelling (and the only one to make any sense) would be "consensus." I find it alarming that someone as learned as Dr. Holsinger is as careless in his writings not to even bother with a spell-checker in his writings. [Even this program won't allow misspellings] Posted by:dcspencer2003 Jun-6 Alright already Mr. Know-it-All, we get it, you read the paper.
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Meet The Meat Beetles!!! (right)
Monday, June 4, 2007
P. S. You certainly may click on the pic for larger detail. (Do they let 'em wear thongs in the jail? What is under those orange jumpsuits, anyway?)
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Friday, June 1, 2007
One topic that has begun to receive much attention among scholars in recent years has been the emergence of a vowel shift unique to California. Much like other vowel shifts occurring in North America such as the Southern Vowel Shift, Northern Cities Vowel Shift, and the Canadian Shift the California Vowel Shift is noted for a systematic chain shift of several vowels.Key quote:
The pin-pen merger is complete in Bakersfield, and speakers in Sacramento either perceive or produce the pairs /ɛn/ and /ɪn/ close to each other.Damn! All of this is going on right next to our ears, but there are none so deaf as those who will not listen.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
John Moore/Getty Images (a subsidiary of Microsoft). Brought to our attention by Dependable Renegade.
I bet that all our enemies, now and in the future, that is reading these comments as well as others, are rubbing their hands,smiling,celibrating that they have many Americans doing what they cannot do, defeat our war heros.THINK ABOUT IT, READ THE COMMENTS AND PUT YOURSELF IN THEIR POSITIONS!!
5/27/2007 11:32:01 AM
How about the 6 year old little girl who died at World Trade Center whose only crime was to go with her mother to work at World Trade Center? God rest this fine young man who gave his all for his country and ours. I salute him and express condolences to his family. Its terrible. Worse yet, lets get mad about these gang of thugs who perpetrated not only 9/11 but these atrocities against our country and these fine young men and women who are there to fight for peace, justice, and rule of law! Support the United States and its mission, its troops, memorialize the fallen heros. God save the United States! 5/27/2007 11:33:27 AM
Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodman Clinton just voted against the FUNDING BILL FOR OUR WAR HEROS.. I can imagine that a person like Barack Hussein Obama making a fatal mistake as that, but Hilary Rodman Clinton ?? And we as Americans, not as Republican or Democrat , are not going to protect our love ones in Iraq giving them the tools to fight with to keep them safe!!! GOD have mercy on the souls of these two people that are running for the Office of the President. Please, please DO NOT VOTE FOR THESE PEOPLE!!! For them and other candidates that have voted against funds for our war heros, must believe that supporting our troops is not as important as becoming the President !!!
5/27/2007 11:18:46 AM
Thank God for this young man who unfortunately fell in the war against terror. BLAME TERROR! BLAME THE ISLAMO NAZIS WHO ARE BENT ON MURDERING ALL THAT IS RIGHT AND DEAR. Hail Mary, full of Grace, Blesses art Thou Amoung Women, and Blessed is the Fruit of Thy Womb, Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death, Amen. Please Blessed Mother, look after the respose of the souls who gave their lives for us and for liberty.
5/27/2007 10:15:16 AM
SORRY FOR THIS MAN ABOUT LOSING HIS SON. AS FAR AS OPPOSITION TO THE IRAQ WAR, THIS MAN AND HIS LIBERAL COMRADES WOULD OPPOSE ANY ACTION ON ANY LEVEL. LINES ARE BEING DRAWN IN THIS COUNTRY,PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT EMINENT DOMAIN TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO RAISE TAX BASE,ABORTION,RAISING ALL TAXES,ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLES AND CALLING ANYONE WHO OPPOSES THEM A FACIST. IT WILL COME DOWN TO WHO IS WILLING TO SACRIFICE THE MOST FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE.
5/27/2007 10:32:35 AM
I am truly sorry that your brave son was killed in Iraq.However, I believe that the Al Qaeda had plans to do what is now being said they wish to do long before 911, Afghanistan and Iraq.Yesterday, the deputy leader of Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has urged supporters in Iraq to extend their "holy war" to other Middle Eastern countries.The extremist eliminate of Islam, which could be as much as a third of the Muslim world, depending on which poll you believe, is extremely intent on spreading their religion to non-believers or infidels as we are called in America. If we refuse to convert or pay their price they are sworn to kill us and our way of life by mandate of Mohamed.Hence, anytime we as a nation of reasonable people, for the most part, can confine them and try to stop them from gaining strength to carry out their version of Mien Kamph we should do it.If we do not, they will be able to carry out their treats. Death to America was a very popular slogan long before 911 and Iraq.Rather than us killing the entire population of the Muslim world to eradicate the threat, which we are capable of doing, it seemed to us that the better way to encourage the people of that part of the world to behave reasonably would be to give them the opportunity to live in freedom and govern themselves.If they had something to live for maybe they would not risk their lives to kill us.We here in America full well know, if the choice is they kill us or we kill them and they are killing us and we are not able to stop them with conventional might, we would chose to kill them anyway way we able to do it. We would demand our nation use its full military might, the big bombs, to save our lives.
5/27/2007 8:58:23 AM
*What exactly is a fathers duty when his son is sent into harm*s way?* How about to support and pray for him? Certainly not to undermine him with your ideological views. The Armed Services are an ALL VOLUNTEER force, ergo the choice was your over 18 year-old son*s to make. It is the height of arrogance for any parent to place their personal politics ahead of the lives of their children.
5/27/2007 7:15:26 AM
Iraq is simply one front in the Global War with Radical Islam. Would Mr. Bacevich feel better had his son been beheaded in Southern Thailand, Blown-up in a bus in London, shot in a Mid-West mall? I think not. Like far too many on the left his hate cloud his abiltiy to see the world clearly. Mr. Bacevich, your son died a hero. Fighting for his country, and our way of life in a remote, hot, dirty, hostile place. You should honor him by seeing to it we win, not cut and run.
5/27/2007 7:17:42 AM
On this Memorial Day I am remembering -I remember relatives who fought in World War II; some returned, some did not.I remember relatives who were sent to Korea; some returned whole, some did not.I remember classmates were were drafted to Vietnam; some returned, some did not.And now I am remembering relatives who volunteered after 9/11, one will never return from Iraq.And I am remembering what America USED to be - "one nation" that proudly proclaimed that we are "a nation of laws" - a nation that had a "can do" attitude - a nation that transformed its immigrants into the self-same Americans.That nation is about to disappear from this earth.Our "betters" have decreed that we are a "multicultural society" and that if there are enough scofflaws that congress (lower case intentional) will simply "change the laws" - that we are a nation that "can't" retain its sovereignty - that we are a nation that is well on its way to be bifurcated not only by a super-highway from Texas to Canada but also bifurcated by language and culture.The looney-lefties are right - bring our troops, those who are flung all around the globe - home, right NOW. Send no more of our young warriors out to protect others - they are needed right here right now as the invasion of America escalates, with ever more danger to its own citizens at the hands of MS13, the drug lords, and the jihadists continues unabated.I don't want to be remembering any more young warriors who have wasted their energies or lives in defense of AmeXica.And so, as we remember the once-proud America, it is "Goodbye, America - you truly once were the shining city on the hill" and "hola, ameXica - you truly are becoming another third-world, third-rate country."
5/27/2007 6:39:46 AM
a fathers duty is to honor the hero his son was, not shame him by attacking the institutions his son served under.
5/27/2007 5:47:27 AM
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
This self-contained compound will include the embassy
itself, residences for the ambassador and staff, PX, commissary, cinema, retail and shopping, restaurants, schools, fire station and supporting facilities such as power generation, water purification system, telecommunications, and waste water treatment facilities. In total, the 104 acre compound will include over twenty buildings including one classified secure structure and housing for over 380 families." © 2006 Berger Devine
Yaeger The Uptown Theatre Building 3700 Broadway, Suite 300 Kanasas City, MO 64111-2506 816-561-2761
Wow. Completely self-sufficient. Slap a dome atop it & fire it off into space, I say!
"And there is a ton of information that we do not yet know about this story. Yet there appears to be very little interest in the story from the mainstream press. In part, this is a result of the fact that there is far, far too much focus on Alberto Gonzales in current press and congressional investigations. Just as he was merely a rubber stamp for Rove, et al. in the U.S. Attorney and related scandals, so, too, in these much more significant constitutional crises, he is "merely" an apparatchik, a hired gun of sorts. The real action here has always been in the Vice President's Office -- and on the intrigung question of why the President has repeatedly allowed the Vice President's idiosyncratic views to determine state policy -- and that's where the smoke and fire will be if and when the media and Congress ever get to the bottom of it."
"If and when" indeed. More like "if ever." But something to look forward to, nonetheless.
.Future prexy standing right. Note '40s style pre-presidential codpiece. These guys from Hah-vahd & Yale are just too fucking much.
JFK's current place in history is that he was the first (so far only) Chief Magistrate to have been killed dead in the street while in office during the Telebision Era; stills of a martyred war hero/president's funeral do not have the impact of a televised muffled drums & riderless horse ceremony.
Photos copyright National Geographic.